(Technically this is final exam period at Penn and no assignments may be due during exam period. So, this is actually a "take home final" for the purposes of the rule. I assume no one wants the final paper due earlier than it is scheduled, which is what would be required to fit this peer evaluation in prior to reading period.)
Read the five papers you have been assigned.
For each paper, write 300 words of constructive feedback and rank the papers 1 through 5 on each of these criteria:
A. Is the question answered by the paper clearly stated in the first paragraph, and is it related to technology strategy?
B. Has the question been answered convincingly?
C. Does the paper bring to bear the relevant concepts, tools, and methods from this course to answer the question?
D. Is the paper itself well written, carefully formatted, and with exhibits that are clear and logical?
You will upload a document from a template we provide with this information.
Your grade on this peer evaluation will be based on the quality of the feedback you provide to your peers.